Credit Writedowns Mon 2010-07-19 12:08 EDT

Misunderstanding Modern Monetary Theory

Paul Krugman wrote a post today regarding MMT called "I Would Do Anything For Stimulus, But I Won't Do That (Wonkish)." The gist of Krugman's post was to refute Modern Monetary Theory's view on money and deficits...Krugman's post mischaracterizes both MMT and Galbraith's statement...Krugman is trapped in a gold standard view of money as he assumes the government must issue bonds to fund itself. He forgets that we live in a fiat world...the problem for deficits is not national solvency but inflation and currency depreciation. That makes me worried about deficits. If that makes me an inflation hawk and anti-deficit, then so be it. Nevertheless, MMT does say the same thing about deficits, namely that they can lead to inflation. But MMT also says that inflation is not a problem when you have an enormous output gap from 17% underemployment. MMT proponents recommend deficit spending to close that gap. But you can't spend at will under MMT; eventually the output gap closes and inflation becomes a big problem...

credit writedowns; Misunderstanding Modern Monetary Theory.

Credit Writedowns Sat 2010-05-22 20:58 EDT

MMT: Economics 101 on government budget deficits

...when the government has a deficit in any period, by definition the non-government sector (foreign plus private) must have a surplus of exactly the same amount...I haven't talked about government as the creator of currency and the private sector as the user of currency. I haven't focused on any misallocation of resource or malinvestment issues. I haven't raised the spectre of inflation or currency depreciation. I have simply presented the economics and accounting of budget deficits...

credit writedowns; Economics 101; governments Budget Deficit; MMT.

naked capitalism Fri 2010-03-19 16:02 EDT

Calibrating differences between China and Japan's bubble blow-off top

Edward Harrison

...Is China experiencing a massive bubble or not? If so, will the bubble's inevitable pop spill over into the real economy in a nasty way as it has done in the U.S. and elsewhere?...My own point of reference has been the 1920s and the 1930s more than the 1980s and 1990s. In the 1920s, Great Britain played the role now played by the United States: military power, declining economic power, anchor global currency, and largest debtor nation. The United States played the role now played by China: rising economic and military power and `alpha creditor,' a phrase our Yves Smith coined. (The key difference is that the U.S. was more advanced relative to Great Britain than China relative to the U.S.)...China is effectively doing what France did by accumulating reserves despite fears of currency depreciation. I think this reserve policy is significant because this is what is behind all of the talk of protectionism and currency pegging. The Chinese are afraid that the U.S. are actively looking to devalue the currency while the U.S. are fed up with the peg and the resultant imbalances...

Calibrating differences; China; Japan's bubble blow; naked capitalism; Top.